Quantcast
Channel: MIT EECS
Viewing all 1281 articles
Browse latest View live

MIT expands partnership with Imperial College London

$
0
0

Students from MIT and Imperial College measure the height of a water channel near London. Photo: Courtesy of the students.

 

These augmented multidepartmental exchange programs will allow even more MIT undergraduates to participate in rigorous and enriching study abroad and research experiences at Imperial, a leading U.K. university that focuses exclusively on science, engineering, medicine, and business.

The academic exchange is transforming from a departmental exchange spanning two departments to a multidepartmental exchange involving nine departments. GECD will start sending students on the expanded academic exchange program this coming fall.

Meanwhile, the summer research exchange with Imperial has been growing steadily, from two departments in 2013 to 10 now.

“Such opportunities provide hugely valuable experiences in learning to learn and work in another culture and a different scientific environment,” says Professor Linn Hobbs of the MIT Department of Materials Science and Engineering. “Students find the experience challenging, exciting, and full of potential for both personal and intellectual growth.”

MIT’s partnership with Imperial began in 2013 with a summer research program for students from both schools’ departments of Materials Science and Physics. Hobbs spearheaded the exchange, working closely with Robin Grimes, professor of materials physics at Imperial and chief scientific advisor to the U.K.

Hobbs was also the impetus behind the academic exchange program that shortly followed, and has championed the development of both exchange programs. As part of the academic exchange, a corresponding number of Imperial students come to MIT to partake in courses and research.

Semester/year academic exchange

The academic exchange program offers the opportunity for two juniors each (four in the case of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science) from nine departments to spend either the spring semester of their junior year or their full junior year in the corresponding department at Imperial College London. Students apply through GECD and are selected jointly by faculty in their MIT department and GECD’s Global Education staff.

While on the exchange, students study on Imperial’s campus, which is located in central London’s posh Kensington and Chelsea neighborhoods steps away from such cultural attractions as the Science and Industry Museum, Royal Albert Hall, and numerous music and restaurant venues. Students take academic subjects that provide MIT transfer credit for core or restricted-elected subjects in their majors. In addition, Imperial offers UROP-like experiences whenever possible.

The 2019 academic year will initiate a two-year pilot for the expanded exchange that will enable student participation from seven new departments. These new departments, joining Materials Science and Engineering and Nuclear Science and Engineering, are: Mechanical Engineering; Chemistry; Electrical Engineering and Computer Science; Chemical Engineering; Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences; Aeronautics and Astronautics; and Mathematics.

Faculty as well as students are enthusiastic about the multidepartmental expansion. “We are excited to be initiating a student exchange with Imperial College London, one of the great research institutions of the world,” says Professor Haynes Miller in the Department of Mathematics. “Imperial has an excellent undergraduate program, one that will offer our students the same kind of perspective and growth that the Cambridge-MIT Exchange did. Thirty-seven of our majors spent a year as Cambridge students over the 16 years of the program. Each and every one gained from it in deep ways, and we anticipate the same results from the Imperial project. We look forward also to hosting an equal number of Imperial students here; their different perspectives will enrich the experience of our majors here in Cambridge, Massachusetts.”

Summer research exchange

Since its launch in 2013, the summer research exchange with Imperial has added new departments over the years and welcomed increasing numbers of participants. The research exchange is now open to undergraduates in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, Chemistry, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Physics, Chemical Engineering, Aeronautics and Astronautics, Mathematics, Biological Engineering, and Nuclear Science and Engineering. Each department nominates two students to participate each year. The faculty coordinators then work closely with their counterparts at Imperial to identify labs, faculty supervisors, and advisors for participating students.

The research exchange runs from late June through mid-August. During those weeks, MIT also welcomes Imperial students to its campus. Last summer, 18 MIT students and 18 Imperial students participated in the exchange, including rising MIT junior Yun Chang. Chang, an AeroAstro major who is also an Emerson fellow in piano, immersed himself in his lab’s research on quadrocopter 3-D SLAM implementation, savored the cosmopolitan world of London and Imperial, and attended numerous BBC classical music promenade concerts.

“Doing research at Imperial College London was an amazing experience, and was especially unique in that I got to meet people from all over the world,” says Chang. “I got to do interesting research, and I was able to broaden my horizons. I am already missing walking through Kensington Gardens on my way to Imperial every morning.”

MIT’s UROP office is an integral partner with GECD’s Global Education team for this program. As a co-sponsor, UROP provides student funding through hourly wages and an airfare stipend, while GECD funds MIT students’ accommodations in London.

Looking forward to future collaboration

“MIT is looking forward to a long-term partnership with Imperial College London,” says Julie Maddox, assistant dean for Global Education at GECD. “I’ve seen students profiting from their academic and research experiences at Imperial over the years and have been inspired by how they speak about their intellectual and personal growth. Likewise, Imperial students who come to our campus greatly contribute to our classes and labs and are enthusiastic about their experiences here.”

“I’m thrilled that we succeeded in growing both the academic and research exchanges with Imperial so more students from across MIT will be able to engage in these important opportunities,” adds Malgorzata Hedderick, associate dean for Global Education at GECD. “Imperial has been a very supportive partner over the years and we are excited to continue this mutually beneficial relationship. Huge thanks go to the MIT and Imperial faculty; none of this would have been possible without their leadership, dedication, and involvement.”

Date Posted: 

Sunday, February 25, 2018 - 1:30pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

EECS is among seven departments participating in a pilot student-exchange program to begin in the 2019 academic year.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 


Undergraduate researchers to present findings at SuperUROP Showcase on April 26

$
0
0

Please join us as students in the 2018-2019 Advanced Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (SuperUROP) share the findings of their year-long projects at a special electronic poster session.

The SuperUROP Showcase will be held on Thursday, April 26, from 3 to 5 p.m. in Morss Hall, Walker Memorial (Building 50, 142 Memorial Drive). Masterworks, the EECS poster event for master's-level thesis projects, will immediately follow the Showcase from 5 to 6 p.m. in the same location. Hors d'oeuvres and refreshments will be served throughout the electronic-poster sessions.

The Showcase will be the second poster session for this year's SuperUROP participants, who also presented at the December 2017 Proposal Pitch event. For more information about the program, please visit the SuperUROP website.

Interested in learning more about SuperUROP for the 2018-2019 academic year? Attend one of the upcoming information sessions:

 

  • Monday, March 12, from 4-5 p.m. in 34-401B.
  • Tuesday, March 13, from 4-5 p.m. in 34-401A.
  • Tuesday, March 20, from 12:30-1:30 p.m. in 36-428.

No pre-registration is necessary, and refreshments will be served. 

Date Posted: 

Sunday, February 25, 2018 - 2:45pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

The 2017-2018 class of SuperUROP participants will present the findings of their year-long research projects at a special e-poster session.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Twelve MIT subjects receive No. 1 ratings in 2018 QS World University Rankings

$
0
0

Photo: Jake Belcher

 

 

MIT has been honored with 12 first-place subject rankings in the QS World University Rankings for 2018, including No. 1 rankings for both Computer Science and Information Systems and for Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

MIT also received a No. 1 ranking in the following QS subject areas: Architecture/Built Environment; Chemical Engineering; Chemistry; Civil and Structural Engineering; Linguistics; Materials Science; Mathematics; Mechanical, Aeronautical and Manufacturing Engineering; Physics and Astronomy; and Statistics and Operational Research.   

Additional high-ranking MIT subjects include: Accounting and Finance (No. 2), Art and Design (No. 4), Biological Sciences (No. 2), Business and Management Studies (No. 4), Earth and Marine Sciences (No. 3), Economics and Econometrics (No. 2) and Environmental Sciences (No. 3).

Quacquarelli Symonds Limited subject rankings, published annually, are designed to help prospective students find the leading schools in their field of interest. Rankings cover 48 disciplines and are based on an institute’s research quality and accomplishments, academic reputation, and graduate employment.

MIT has been ranked as the No. 1 university in the world by QS World University Rankings for six straight years.

 

Date Posted: 

Friday, March 2, 2018 - 3:45pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

EECS offerings are among the top-ranked areas.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Institute Professor Barbara Liskov to receive 2018 Computer Pioneer Award

$
0
0

MIT Institute Professor Barbara Liskov

EECS Staff

The IEEE Computer Society has named Institute Professor Barbara Liskov as the recipient of is 2018 Computer Pioneer Award.

The society gives the award in recognition of significant contributions to early concepts and developments that have clearly advanced the state of the art in computing. Specifically, Liskov is being honored for her "pioneering data abstraction, polymorphism, and support for fault tolerance and distributed computing in the programming languages CLU and Argus,” according to the society’s announcement.  

Liskov, a long-time EECS faculty member, is head of the Programming Methodology Group in the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). Her research interests include distributed and parallel systems, programming methodology, and programming languages.  

She is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, the National Academy of Sciences, and National Inventors Hall of Fame. She is a fellow of both the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and a charter fellow of the National Academy of Inventors.

She has also received the ACM Turing Award, the IEEE John von Neumann Medal, an achievement award from the ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages (SIGPLAN), and a lifetime achievement award from the Society of Women Engineers. In 2003, Discover Magazine named her one of the 50 most important women in science.

Liskov received a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from University of California Berkeley and master’s and PhD degrees in computer science from Stanford University. She was one of the first women in the United States to earn a doctorate in computer science.

The IEEE Computer Society Board of Governors established the Computer Pioneer Award in 1981 to recognize individuals whose efforts influenced the computer industry. The award is presented to people whose main contribution to the concepts and development of the computer field was made at least 15 years earlier.

Liskov will receive the Computer Pioneer Award at the 2019 Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), held in conjunction with SEMICON West in San Francisco in July 2019. The award consists of a silver medal and a speaking invitation.

Date Posted: 

Friday, March 2, 2018 - 4:45pm

Labs: 

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

The IEEE Computer Society award recognizes the long-time EECS faculty member’s contributions to programming languages.

Photo: 

Learn all about SuperUROP at upcoming information sessions

$
0
0

SuperUROP Scholar Nichole Clarke at the December 2017 Proposal Pitch poster session. Photo: Gretchen Ertl

Juniors and seniors are invited to attend an upcoming information session to learn more about the Advanced Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (better known as SuperUROP). The program is primarily targeted to students in the School of Engineering and the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences.

At each session, the SuperUROP team will describe what the program offers and how it works, as well as explaining the process and timeline for applications. There will be plenty of time for questions and answers, and refreshments will be served.

Information sessions will be held on: 

  • Monday, March 12, from 4-5 p.m. in 34-401B (Grier B).
  • Tuesday, March 13, from 4-5 p.m. in 34-401A (Grier A)
  • Tuesday, March 20, from 12:30-1:30 p.m. in 36-428 (Haus and Allen Rooms).

 

No need to pre-register -- just drop in!

For more information, visit superurop.mit.edu or email superurop-contact@mit.edu.

 

 

Date Posted: 

Friday, March 2, 2018 - 5:00pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Juniors and seniors are invited to join us on March 12, 13, or 20!

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Timothy Lu seeks to combat disease by reprogramming biological systems

$
0
0

Professor Timothy Lu                                                                                                                                      Photo: M. Scott Brauer

Anne Trafton | MIT News

 

In high school and college, Timothy Lu spent a lot of time programming computers. But as his college graduation approached, he turned his attention toward programming biological systems. The field of synthetic biology was just beginning to emerge, and he wanted to be part of it.

Since that time, Lu has devoted his career to coming up with novel ways to engineer cells, both bacterial and human, to perform new functions. Using this approach, he hopes to develop new therapies for a range of diseases, from cancer to drug-resistant infections.

Achieving this goal requires overcoming many more challenges than programming computer chips does, he says, because living cells behave in more unpredictable ways and the underlying programming language is not deeply understood.

“The advantage of the semiconductor industry is they were able to build individual units and put them together and scale them very efficiently. They weren’t putting things into an existing system that was already messy and where you didn’t know the wiring diagram,” says Lu, who recently earned tenure in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. “In contrast, we’re simultaneously trying to figure out how to assemble genetic circuits together and also stick it into this giant mish-mash of what the cell normally does. That’s the key challenge.”

Fundamental challenges

Lu’s early interest in computer programming was inspired by his father, who worked as an electrical engineer at IBM.

“My dad brought home some of the early PCs that they were building at IBM, and I spent a lot of time programming computers and making them do very simple things,” Lu recalls.

When Lu was 10 years old, his family moved from upstate New York to Taiwan, where his parents had grown up. He returned to the United States to attend MIT, where he majored in electrical engineering and computer science. When he graduated in 2003, Lu realized that he enjoyed programming but wanted to apply this interest to nascent technologies with fundamental challenges that had yet to be solved.

He soon became intrigued by the idea of programming biological systems. Many Boston-area researchers were beginning to work in this field, known as synthetic biology. Lu decided to apply to the Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology (HST), and he arranged to do his PhD research in a lab at Boston University headed by synthetic biology pioneer James Collins (who is now a faculty member at MIT).

As part of his HST coursework, Lu saw many patients with antibiotic-resistant infections and became interested in trying to develop new treatments for such infections. In Collins’ lab, Lu worked on engineering viruses that infect bacteria, also known as bacteriophages. He engineered these bacteriophages to produce enzymes that help to chew up biofilms (layers of bacteria that stick to surfaces), and in 2008, he won the Lemelson-MIT Student Prize for this work. In a related project, he engineered bacteria to express factors that make them more susceptible to existing antibiotics.

After finishing his PhD, and an MD as well, Lu pondered a few career paths, including practicing medicine or working at a startup based on his research, but he ended up applying for a faculty position in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, which was looking for someone interested in programming biological circuits. MIT had recently hired a couple of prominent synthetic biologists to launch the Institute’s new Synthetic Biology Center, and Lu was eager to get involved.

“At the time, MIT was trying to build up its synthetic biology team. I knew if I joined I would be the most junior member but would be part of something that was going to quickly grow, so it was exciting for me,” says Lu, who later received a joint appointment in MIT’s Department of Biological Engineering.

Disease-fighting circuits

Much of Lu’s research focuses on designing genetic circuits that can perform computations in living cells, such as counting events or tracking whether a specific event has occurred and then provoking the appropriate response.

“My deepest personal interest is in the clinical applications of synthetic biology,” Lu says. “Can you program cells or viruses to sense and respond to their environment, so that you can try to detect the presence of disease and treat it effectively and safely?”

In a recent study, Lu and his colleagues developed a synthetic gene circuit that triggers the body’s immune system to attack cancers when it detects signs of the disease. They are also working on designing more control elements to help them turn such circuits on and off, and developing ways to help circuits change their output in response to different disease biomarkers.

Lu’s lab also continues to pursue novel antimicrobial treatments, including engineered bacteriophages as well as new types of antimicrobial peptides. By modifying these naturally occurring proteins, Lu hopes to make them more efficient at killing microbes, and potentially to develop them for use against infection in humans.

Such research has become increasingly important, Lu says, as more strains of bacteria become resistant to existing drugs.

“When we first started, in the early 2000s, people didn’t care about antibiotic resistance that much. Most antibiotics were still working and people didn’t think it was a big deal,” he says. “But over time, resistance has continued to grow, and the antibiotic pipeline has become drier and drier. So we still firmly believe that we need new strategies. The days when you would just go and dig in the dirt and easily find new antibiotics with broad-spectrum activity are over.”

For related content about this story, please visit the MIT News website.

Date Posted: 

Monday, March 5, 2018 - 5:30pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Synthetic biologist (and EECS professor) hopes to develop treatments for cancer and other diseases.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

ML 2.0: Machine learning for many

$
0
0

 

Today, when an enterprise wants to use machine learning to solve a problem, they have to call in the cavalry. Even a simple problem requires multiple data scientists, machine learning experts, and domain experts to come together to agree on priorities and exchange data and information.

This process is often inefficient, and it takes months to get results. It also only solves the problem immediate at hand. The next time something comes up, the enterprise has to do the same thing all over again.

One group of MIT researchers wondered, "What if we tried another strategy? What if we created automation tools that enable the subject matter experts to use ML, in order to solve these problems themselves?"

For the past five years, Kalyan Veeramachaneni, a principal research scientist at MIT’s Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, along with Max Kanter and Ben Schreck, who began working with Veeramachaneni as MIT students and later co-founded machine learning startup Feature Labs, has been designing a rigorous paradigm for applied machine learning. (Both Kanter and Schreck received bachelor's and master's of engineering degrees in EECS.)

The team first divided the process into a discrete set of steps. For instance, one step involved searching for buried patterns with predictive power, known as “feature engineering.” Another is called "model selection," in which the best modeling technique is chosen from the many available options. They then automated these steps, releasing open-source tools to help domain experts efficiently complete them.

In their new paper, “Machine Learning 2.0: Engineering Data Driven AI Products,” the team brings together these automation tools, turning raw data into a trustworthy, deployable model over the course of seven steps. This chain of automation makes it possible for subject matter experts — even those without data science experience — to use machine learning to solve business problems.

“Through automation, ML 2.0 frees up subject matter experts to spend more time on the steps that truly require their domain expertise, like deciding which problems to solve in the first place and evaluating how predictions impact business outcomes,” says Schreck.

Last year, Accenture joined the MIT and Feature Labs team to undertake an ambitious project — build an AI project manager by developing and deploying a machine learning model that could predict critical problems ahead of time and augment seasoned human project managers in the software industry.

This was an opportunity to test ML 2.0's automation tool, Featuretools, an open-source library funded by DARPA’s Data-Driven Discovery of Models (D3M) program, on a real-world problem.

Veeramachaneni and his colleagues closely collaborated with domain experts from Accenture along every step, from figuring out the best problem to solve, to running through a robust gauntlet of testing. The first model the team built was to predict the performance of software projects against a host of delivery metrics. When testing was completed, the model was found to correctly predict more than 80 percent of project performance outcomes.

Using Featuretools involved a series of human-machine interactions. In this case, Featuretools first recommended 40,000 features to the domain experts. Next, the humans used their expertise to narrow this list down to the 100 most promising features, which they then put to work training the machine-learning algorithm.

Next, the domain experts used the software to simulate using the model, and test how well it would work as new, real-time data came in. This method also extends the "train-test-validate" protocol typical to contemporary machine-learning research, making it more applicable to real-world use. The model was then deployed making predictions for hundreds of projects on a weekly basis.

"We wanted to apply machine learning (ML) to critical problems that we face in the technology services business," says Sanjeev Vohra, global technology officer, Accenture Technology. "More specifically, we wanted to see for ourselves if MIT’s ML 2.0 could help anticipate potential risks in software delivery. We are very happy with the outcomes, and will be sharing them broadly so others can also benefit.”

In a separate joint paper, "The AI Project Manager," the teams walk through how they used the ML 2.0 paradigm to achieve fast and accurate predictions.

“For 20 years, the task of applying machine learning to problems has been approached as a research or feasibility project, or an opportunity to make a discovery,” says Veeramachaneni. “With these new automation tools it is now possible to create a machine learning model from raw data and put them to use — within weeks,” says Veeramachaneni.

The team intends to keep honing ML 2.0 in order to make it relevant to as many industry problems as possible. “This is the true idea behind democratizing machine learning. We want to make ML useful to a broad swath of people,” he adds.

In the next five years, we are likely to see an increase in the adoption of ML 2.0. "As the momentum builds, developers will be able to set up a ML apparatus just as they set up a database," says Max Kanter, CEO at Feature Labs. "It will be that simple."

 

Date Posted: 

Wednesday, March 7, 2018 - 2:15pm

Labs: 

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Automated data science tools developed by MIT and Feature Labs (co-founded by two EECS alums) deliver their first AI product.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

MIT Intelligence Quest kicks off

$
0
0

School of Engineering Dean Anantha Chandrakasan addresses the crowd at the launch event. Photo: Gretchen Ertl

 

“In the history of science and technology, there are moments of opportunity,” MIT President L. Rafael Reif told a packed Kresge Auditorium on March 1. “Moments when the tools, the data, and the big questions are perfectly in sync. In the field of intelligence, I believe this is just such a moment.”

MIT faculty and friends helped the Institute celebrate the launch of a new initiative on human and machine intelligence, with a star-studded lineup of speakers from the interlocking realms of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, social sciences, and ethics. Several EECS professors and alumni were among the speakers.

“We are auguring in the Age of Intelligence right here,” said Eric Schmidt, the former executive chairman of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, as he joined Reif on stage. Schmidt and his wife provided financial support for the project’s first year. Google also donated funds to advance MIT student research in human and artificial intelligence.

“I think MIT is uniquely positioned to do this. I think you can turn Cambridge into a genuine AI center,” said Schmidt, an MIT Innovation Fellow and founding advisor to the MIT Intelligence Quest.

With MIT’s 200 or more intelligence researchers and culture of “compulsive curiosity,” the MIT Intelligence Quest will thrive on campus, said Anantha Chandrakasan, dean of the School of Engineering and the Vannevar Bush Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

“It will thrive because, when MIT people have their teeth in an interesting problem, they instinctively reach out across disciplines to solve it,” he said. “It will thrive because we can offer it a continuous flow of fresh minds and fresh thinking.”

 The time is ripe to “crack the code of intelligence” with a combination of neuroscience, cognitive science, and computer science, said MIT alumnus David Siegel SM ’86, PhD ’91, also a founding advisor to the MIT Intelligence Quest. He envisions the Intelligence Quest carrying on the spirit of MIT’s AI Lab at Tech Square in the 1980s, which spawned the building blocks of the Internet, RSA encryption, and the foundations AI and robotics.

“From the start of our history, we have been trying to grasp how the mind gives rise to intelligence,” said Siegel, co-chairman of Two Sigma Investments. “To truly understand it, I believe we need to get back to the basic science and also frame the question in engineering terms. The time to start is now. Our objectives are ambitious. But given MIT’s long history of tackling big problems, we must try. After all, if not us, then who?”

It is time to drive some breakthroughs in AI together, said MIT alumnus Xiao’ou Tang PhD ’96, the founder of SenseTime, a leading AI company in China, which has partnered with the MIT Intelligence Quest.

“Together we will definitely go beyond deep learning, go to the uncharted territory of deep thinking,” said Tang, a professor of information engineering at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Getting to the Core

The morning sessions of the MIT Intelligence Quest launch event were designed to mirror the two principal entities that will make up the Intelligence Quest itself: the Core and the Bridge. The Core will advance the science and engineering of both human and machine intelligence. The Bridge will be dedicated to the application of MIT discoveries in natural and artificial intelligence to all disciplines.  

A passion for the MIT Intelligence Quest itself — the puzzles, the breakthroughs, the careful work — marked the research presentations for the Core. Pacing the stage in an animated TED-style talk, James DiCarlo, head of the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, embodied this passion.

“My colleagues and I see a tremendous new opportunity for synergy. The science quest to understand human intelligence is one of the most exciting frontiers of our field: the quest to understand ourselves. And it’s aligned with the engineering quest of developing intelligent systems,” said DiCarlo, the Peter de Florez Professor of Neuroscience.

Then he shared an observation that was made in colorful ways throughout the day: The possibilities for discovery are great, but right now, “we are still very far from real AI.” The human brain is far superior to any existing form of artificial intelligence, which is why, he said, “as scientists, we have the opportunity — and obligation — to reverse engineer this brain machine.”

Daniela Rus, director of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) and the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, showed the same passion expressed from a different perspective: “Right now, the vast majority of AI algorithms are driven by mathematics and physics. When we learn more about the human brain, we will be able to develop nature-inspired algorithms.”

“Why science and engineering?” asked Tomaso Poggio, director of the Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines and the Eugene McDermott Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. He traced major developments in machine learning to neuroscience. The Core will feature projects that require both science and engineering, which is a good thing because “ideally we want to make ourselves and our brains more intelligent than the machines we are building.”

A craving for data

Teaching machines to see and hear was the focus for Antonio Torralba, MIT director of the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab and a professor of electrical engineering and computer science. At one point, he showed a video of a child happily listening to a storybook but bursting into shrieks when the reading stopped. “Just like machines, kids also need a lot of data,” Torralba said, with a smile. “And they don’t like it when you stop giving them data.”

Indeed, look to the playground for the intelligence platform you see, said Laura Schultz, a professor of cognitive science. Children learn concepts naturally. They have sophisticated social cognition and an intelligence that can “see past what things actually are to see what they might mean, or become.”

“This kind of intelligence might seem almost unimaginably far away,” she said. “But if we are going to succeed at engineering it, we first have to understand it, and the good news is that we actually have a platform like this already here at MIT, at the daycare.”

Rebecca Saxe, a professor of cognitive neuroscience, showed a baby watching a movie in an MRI machine. “We took the first ever MRI images of a baby’s brain while he looked at faces,” she said. “And we discovered something remarkable.” Their results revealed an organized pattern of brain activity develops very early, with regions of the infant brain more active when babies look at faces. 

The value of the child intelligence system is not lost on Josh Tenenbaum, a professor of computational cognitive science. “Children are the only system in the known universe that demonstrably, reliably, reproducibly, builds human-level intelligence. So why not build AI this way? Why haven’t we yet?” he asked. “I think the reason is that only now do we have a scientific field studying how children learn and think that is mature enough to offer guidance for AI.”

Building a humanistic bridge

In the Bridge session, speakers detailed projects that highlighted the remarkable potential benefits of AI: social robots that help children learn and engage the depressed, algorithms that can predict and prevent cancer, Wi-Fi signals that detect when elderly people fall, even algorithms that build personalized investment portfolios.

James Collins, the Termeer Professor of Medical Engineering and Science, talked about programmable cells and the world of possible applications in various realms: medicine, energy, environment, and agriculture.

“I also have a vision for AI,” said Cynthia Breazeal, associate professor of media arts and sciences, next. “I envision an AI that helps us to be smarter and more productive and to flourish — and heightens the ability for people to deeply connect.”

“AI needs to be able to engage our social and emotional selves in addition to our cognitive selves,” she added, as people watched film of elderly people with Jibo, a social robot that she designed. It danced, cooed, and looked with friendly curiosity at them.

Regina Barzilay, the Delta Electronics Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, pointed to a map of the world covered in red markings that indicate deaths from cancer. “I firmly believe with all of our strengths in machine learning and connections we really have a chance to wipe the red from this map.” Her own work in machine learning is making strides toward that goal.

“I want you to imagine with me a home of the future where the home will monitor your health,” said Dina Katabi, the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, drawing listeners into a presentation on how AI enables the home to monitor the physical and mental health of its inhabitants using Wi-Fi signals.

In a presentation playfully titled, “Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Stupidity, and Financial Markets,” Andrew Lo, director of the MIT Laboratory for Financial Engineering and the Charles and Susan T. Harris Professor, described algorithms that factor in unproductive human actions that impact financial markets: loss aversion, overconfidence, and overreaction. “We don’t need artificial intelligence so much as artificial humanity,” he said.

Marin Soljacic, a professor of physics, capped the Bridge session off by talking about how AI processing will improve with optical neural networks. “We’re talking about nearly instantaneous execution, much higher frequencies than electronics, ultra low power consumption!” The crowd shared his enthusiasm.

The consequences: intelligence and society

“In my estimation AI is going to touch all these industries: energy, advance manufacturing, space, advanced materials, life science and biotech, internet of things,” said Katie Rae, CEO and managing partner of The Engine, which bridges the gap between discovery and commercialization by empowering disruptive technologies with the long-term capital, knowledge, and specialized equipment and labs they need to thrive.

“What does it mean for us to build machines that can think?” asked Melissa Nobles, the Kenan Sahin Dean of the MIT School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, during the panel discussion, “The Consequences: Intelligence and Society.”

“What are the social, economic, political, artistic, ethical, and spiritual consequences of trying to make what happens in our minds happen in a machine? Who does this machine answer to?” asked Nobles, a professor of political science.

Gideon Lichfield, editor-in-chief of MIT Technology Review, moderated the discussion, which delved into AI’s potential dark side, exploring issues such as the impact on jobs and the economy, algorithmic bias, and the unchecked power of private industry.

“We need thoughtful folks to really put their values into the system and pay mindful attention,” said MIT alumna Megan Smith’86, SM ’88, a former U.S. chief technology officer and a former vice president at Google. Pointing to her shirt, which read “Computer Science for All,” Smith said all school children should learn coding and design thinking. “It’s about confidence. Part of the future of work is including everyone in developing solutions,” said Smith, founder and CEO of shift7.

Dario Gil, vice president of AI and quantum computing at IBM, said AI technologies draw on such large and pre-existing data sets, it’s more difficult for people to recognize the misuse of variables such as race, age, and gender. “It becomes more opaque,” he said.

“I’d like to talk about job displacement,” said Rodney Brooks, a former CSAIL director. “We don’t have any capability of robots interacting with people. Who is going to do the physical tasks?” asked Brooks, the MIT Panasonic Professor of Robotics Emeritus.

And guidance from a reliable government would be welcome, said several panelists, including Joi Ito, director of the MIT Media Lab. “I think we can look to countries that have functional democracies to see how they are starting to grapple with some of these social questions,” he said.

“We haven’t had enough human intelligence to go with machine intelligence,” added Daron Acemoglu, the Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics. “The real promise of machine-human intelligence is to create jobs that are higher paying and more pleasant and that leave greater room for people to develop their creativity. The application of digital technology can do this — but we need to step back and develop it the right way.”

“It is about the types of artificial intelligence we create,” Acemoglu added. “And it’s about getting a broader set of people working on developing it.”

The event wrapped up at the Media Lab with a student poster session that included projects focused on communication: humans, robots, AI; algorithms of AI; physics, engineering, and security; and vision and language.

For more on MIT IQ, visit the MIT News website or intelligencequest.mit.edu

Date Posted: 

Wednesday, March 7, 2018 - 5:15pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

A star-studded lineup that featured several EECS faculty members and alumni helped celebrate the launch of a new initiative focused on human and machine intelligence.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 


The 'Infinite' debuts in California

$
0
0

MIT faculty and students addressed alumni during the first "Infinite" symposium in the Bay Area. Photo: Hagpop's Photography.

 


 

The School of Engineering recently convened MIT alumni and friends in California to talk about innovations in health care during a symposium that brought the atmosphere of Cambridge to the Bay Area, according to MIT alumnus Adeeti Ullal PhD ’13, an engineering manager at Apple in Cupertino, California.

“It was great to see alumni from all classes and many industries come together,” Ullal said. “Whether it was inspiring talks from MIT professors or casual scientific chats with fellow attendees, I was reminded of how much I enjoy sharing with and learning from the MIT community.”

In lively presentations at the Garden Court Hotel in Palo Alto, MIT faculty and graduate students, including representatives from MIT EECS, described scientific and engineering research advances in the first "Infinite" symposium, which was developed by the dean of MIT’s School of Engineering, Anantha Chandrakasan, the Vannevar Bush Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. The inaugural symposium was titled “Engineers Revolutionizing Health Care.”

Dina Katabi, the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, talked about the health-aware homes of the future. Her work involves using an advanced form of Wi-Fi box with an embedded machine-learning algorithm to track the breathing, heart rate, sleep, and even gait speed of individuals within a home.

“What a great response,” she said following the presentation. “People asked so many questions about how all of this could change the health care system. They were curious about the potential impact on coronary diseases in particular. And they wanted to explore questions about security and privacy.”

Biomedical engineer Carlos Castro-Gonzalez, an M+Vision Fellow at MIT, described his work at startup Leuko Labs, which is developing the first technology to monitor white blood cells noninvasively and help chemotherapy patients have safer treatments.

Leuko Labs, he said, has a working prototype that can snap pictures through the skin of a patient's finger to make an assessment of their white blood cell status. It was recently tested in a pilot clinical study that demonstrated the technique can accurately detect chemotherapy patients with crucially low white blood cell values.

“After this milestone, the team is working to spin out the technology to a commercial venture,” he said. Castro-Gonzalez said he aimed to leave attendees with “a sense of the variety and depth of the health care-related work being performed at MIT.”

MIT graduate student Anne Kim, the CEO of GeneTank, a biotech startup, said the symposium was a wonderful opportunity to hear from MIT's leaders in health innovation. “GeneTank is extremely grateful for the opportunity to showcase our marketplace for disease-focused artificial intelligence models, and get feedback from all the thought leaders that attended,” she said. “I hope attendees took away a shared sense of awe at the impressive work being done at MIT.”

Other presenters included Regina Barzilay, the Delta Electronics Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, who described fundamental problems in today’s cancer care that machine learning can solve. Cullen Buie, an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, talked about his work on a new microfluidic device that may speed up DNA insertion in bacteria, the first step in genetic engineering. And Linda Griffith, School of Engineering Professor of Teaching Innovation, Biological Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering, discussed her groundbreaking work unraveling the biology of endometriosis.

“In each of the research overviews there were personal touches that helped the audience to connect to the speaker and more importantly to the importance of their work,” said Alice Wang '97, PhD '04, an assistant general manager at MediaTek in Santa Clara. She said the presentations kept the audience engaged.

“The takeaway was that MIT is working on relevant research in the area of health care and incorporating machine learning into many aspects. The professors are passionate about their work and there is good collaboration with each other. The research is very exciting and relevant,” she said.

“Also it is quite refreshing to see mostly women professors speaking. MIT is making good strides in diversity. As an alum, I feel very proud to be associated with MIT and part of the community."

For related content, please visit the MIT News website.

 

Date Posted: 

Friday, March 9, 2018 - 5:45pm

Labs: 

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

MIT faculty and students discussed their health-care research during the symposium, hosted by School of Engineering Dean Anantha Chandrakasan.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Second annual Women in Data Science conference showcases research, explores challenges

$
0
0

EECS PhD student Tsui-Wei "Lily" Weng (center) networks with her peers at the 2018 Women in Data Science conference. Photo: Dana J. Quigley

 

 

Two hundred students, industry professionals, and academic leaders convened in Cambridge recently for the second annual Women in Data Science (WiDS) conference.

The MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS) co-hosted the event with Harvard University’s Institute for Applied Computational Science (IACS) and Microsoft Research New England, in partnership with Stanford University. Attendance at the conference, held at Microsoft’s New England Research and Development (NERD) Center, grew from 150 participants last year.

“The WiDS conference highlighted female leadership in data science in the Boston area,” said WiDS steering committee member Caroline Uhler, Henry L. and Grace Doherty assistant professor in EECS and IDSS. “This event is particularly important to encourage more female scientists in related areas to join this emerging area that has such broad societal impact.”

Regina Barzilay, Delta Electronics Professor of EECS, gave the first presentation on how data science and machine learning approaches are improving cancer research. Barzilay explained how her experiences as a breast cancer survivor motivates her work: “Going through this treatment really opened my eyes to how much computer science and data science is not a part of that equation,” she said.

Barzilay discovered that most clinical decisions in breast cancer treatment were based on 3 percent of patients — those participating in clinical trials — leaving a huge amount of unused patient information. Her research uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) and deep neural networks to organize and analyze some of that previously unused patient data in the hopes of better understanding the connection between features of the disease and treatment outcomes. She is also developing techniques to use pixel-by-pixel analysis of mammogram images to assess cancer risks earlier than humans can.

Other speakers showed the broad applicability of data science approaches to many fields in addition to health care. Tamara Broderick, ITT Career Development Assistant Professor of EECS and a member of IDSS, spoke about developing a modern toolbox for data analysis. Ideally, that toolbox would be reliable and accurate, with theoretical guarantees on quality, Broderick said. The tools should allow practitioners to assess how certain they are about the reported outcomes. The output of the tools should be interpretable, and running the tools should be fast and easy for non-expert practitioners, she added. Moreover, the tools should be able to run on streaming data, where new data are constantly being acquired, and should be able to take advantage of modern, distributed computing. Broderick also discussed how to achieve these qualities in practical applications, citing examples in evaluating the efficacy of microloans and online advertising.

Francesca Dominici, professor of biostatistics and co-director of the Data Science Initiative at Harvard, presented on the power of data science to affect environmental policy. Dominici combines meteorological, traffic, land-use, and demographic data against Medicare claims to assess health risks of pollutants. Her research was referenced by U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) during a Senate hearing for Kathleen Hartnett White, President Trump’s former nominee to head the Council on Environmental Quality.

From the industry side of health care, Sanofi's Heather Bell spoke about the potential for data science to improve the clinical trial process. Bell is senior vice president and global head of digital and analytics at Sanofi, a biopharmaceutical company. She noted that 35 percent of clinical trial time was spent in recruiting patients, a process greatly improved by using patient data to identify candidates. This can shorten trials from years to months, save millions of dollars, open studies to thousands more participants, and ultimately lead to improved outcomes.

While data science has great potential to improve research in numerous fields, it presents new challenges. One critical challenge was highlighted by Cynthia Dwork, the Gordon McKay Professor of Computer Science at Harvard and Radcliffe Alumnae Professor at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. Dwork spoke of fairness and a “catalog of evils” identified by researchers in algorithm use, such as excluding zip codes for targeted advertising based on the racial makeup of neighborhoods. Algorithms aren’t neutral, Dwork argued, and can present problems if they “lack cultural awareness.”

Challenges were also a theme of the concluding panel talk of speakers and women working in data science. In addition to bias, they discussed transparency, security, and privacy. “I think people have no idea, no comprehension how much data is out there on them,” Bell mused. “I think there will need to be a reckoning on some of this.”

Despite these challenges, all agreed that data science can have an extraordinary impact in addressing social challenges. Data scientists can apply their skills in almost limitless ways by collaborating with researchers wherever data sets are or can be made available. As Broderick put it: “I had all these interests and thought: 'If only there was one magical field that combined them.'”

New to the conference this year was a hall of student posters showcasing data science work in a broad range of fields, and recruitment opportunities for industry partners. The 2018 conference also included the announcement of the winners of the first WiDS Datathon competition, which ran throughout February. The Datathon challenged teams to come up with data science solutions to alleviate global poverty. Worcester Polytechnic Institute’s “Team Minions,” comprised of Xi Liu and Ye Wang, was both the local Massachusetts first-place winner and a global winner. The pair emphasized the importance of open source models and tools to their project.

IDSS Executive Director Elizabeth Sikorovsky joined Harvard IACS Executive Director Catherine Chute in making opening and closing remarks. They noted that the event sold out on the first day and joined more than 150 other conferences and events worldwide, all led by women. “We are part of a global movement,” Chute said.

 

 

Date Posted: 

Wednesday, March 21, 2018 - 4:00pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Co-hosted by MIT's Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, WiDS Cambridge brought together students, academic leaders, and industry partners.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Solving a Rubik's Cube in record time

$
0
0

 

See the video on the MIT News website.

MIT News

Few toys have captured the public’s imagination quite like the Rubik’s Cube. Rubik’s Cube references have been made in all corners of popular culture — from "The Simpsons" to "Being John Malkovich."For the better part of four decades, this small handheld object has tormented those who tried to solve it.

Over the years, competitions have been held to see who could solve the Rubik’s Cube the fastest by hand. Engineers then started building robots programmed to solve the cube at a lightning speeds. In 2016, a robot broke the world record and solved the cube in 0.637 seconds. Mechanical engineering graduate student Ben Katz and third-year EECS major Jared Di Carlo thought they could do better.

“We watched the videos of the previous robots, and we noticed that the motors were not the fastest that could be used,” recalls Di Carlo. “We thought we could do better with improved motors and controls.”

The pair met through the MIT Electronics Research Society, MITERS, a student-run hacker space. Throughout January’s Independent Activities Period, they set out to build a robot that could shatter the world-record for solving a Rubik’s Cube.

“The gist is that there is a motor actuating each face of a Rubik’s Cube," explains Katz, who conducts research at MIT’s Biomimetic Robotics Lab. Custom-built electronics and controls are then used to control each of those motors. The robot also has pair of webcams pointed at the cube. “When we tell the robot to solve the cube, we use those webcams to identify the different colors on the face of the cube,” says Katz.

Di Carlo wrote software that identifies the colors of each individual part within the cube to determine the cube’s initial state. The team then used existing software written to instruct the robot on exactly how to move the pieces to solve the puzzle.

The result? They set a new world record. It only took their robot 0.38 seconds to solve the Rubik’s Cube. The team credits the unique skills they brought to the table as the key to their success. “I worked on the computer vision software, while Ben worked on the more mechanical stuff,” adds Di Carlo.

For a short video of the robot solving the Rubik's cube, visit the MIT News website.Additional credits: Article by Mary Beth O'Leary, Department of Mechanical Engineering. Video by: Ben Katz/Jared Di Carlo.

Date Posted: 

Wednesday, March 21, 2018 - 4:45pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

A robot developed by MIT students Ben Katz and Jared Di Carlo can solve a Rubik’s Cube in a record-breaking 0.38 seconds.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

MIT graduate engineering program tops U.S. News & World Report rankings

$
0
0

 

Photo: Christopher Harting

MIT News

 

MIT’s graduate program in engineering has again earned a No. 1 spot in U.S. News and Word Report’s annual rankings, a place it has held since 1990, when the magazine first ranked such programs.

The MIT Sloan School of Management also placed highly, occupying the No. 5 spot for the best graduate business program.

This year, U.S. News also ranked the nation’s top PhD programs in the sciences, which it last evaluated in 2014. The magazine awarded No. 1 spots to MIT programs in biology (tied with Stanford University and the University of California at Berkeley), computer science (tied with Carnegie Mellon University, Stanford, and Berkeley), and physics (tied with Stanford). No. 2 spots went to MIT programs in chemistry (tied with Harvard University, Stanford, and Berkeley), earth sciences (tied with Stanford and Berkeley); and mathematics (tied with Harvard, Stanford, and Berkeley).

Among individual engineering disciplines, MIT placed first in six areas: aerospace/aeronautical/astronautical engineering (tied with Caltech), chemical engineering, computer engineering, electrical/electronic/communications engineering (tied with Stanford and Berkeley), materials engineering, and mechanical engineering. It placed second in nuclear engineering.

In the rankings of individual MBA specialties, MIT placed first in information systems and production/operations. It placed second in supply chain/logistics and third in entrepreneurship.

U.S. News does not issue annual rankings for all doctoral programs but revisits many every few years. This year, MIT ranked in the top five for 24 of the 37 science disciplines evaluated.

The magazine bases its rankings of graduate schools of engineering and business on two types of data: reputational surveys of deans and other academic officials, and statistical indicators that measure the quality of a school’s faculty, research, and students. The magazine’s less-frequent rankings of programs in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities are based solely on reputational surveys.

For related coverage, visit the MIT News website.

Date Posted: 

Wednesday, March 21, 2018 - 5:30pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Individual EECS programs also receive top marks.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Soft robotic fish swims alongside real ones in coral reefs

$
0
0

 

SoFi was developed with the goal of being as nondisruptive to ocean life as possible, swimming alongside real fish for several minutes at a time. Photo: CSAIL

 

 

This month, scientists published rare footage of one of the Arctic’s most elusive sharks. The findings demonstrate that, even with many technological advances in recent years, it remains a challenging task to document marine life up close.

But MIT computer scientists believe they have a possible solution: using robots.

In a paper out in March 2018, a team from MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) unveiled “SoFi,” a soft robotic fish that can independently swim alongside real fish in the ocean.

During test dives in the Rainbow Reef in Fiji, SoFi swam at depths of more than 50 feet for up to 40 minutes at once, nimbly handling currents and taking high-resolution photos and videos using (what else?) a fisheye lens.

Using its undulating tail and a unique ability to control its own buoyancy, SoFi can swim in a straight line, turn, or dive up or down. The team also used a waterproofed Super Nintendo controller and developed a custom acoustic communications system that enabled them to change SoFi’s speed and have it make specific moves and turns.

“To our knowledge, this is the first robotic fish that can swim untethered in three dimensions for extended periods of time,” says CSAIL PhD candidate Robert Katzschmann, lead author of the new journal article published today in ScienceRobotics. “We are excited about the possibility of being able to use a system like this to get closer to marine life than humans can get on their own.”

Katzschmann worked on the project and wrote the paper with CSAIL director Daniela Rus, graduate student Joseph DelPreto and former postdoc Robert MacCurdy, who is now an assistant professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder.

How it works

Existing autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) have traditionally been tethered to boats or powered by bulky and expensive propellers.

In contrast, SoFi has a much simpler and more lightweight setup, with a single camera, a motor, and the same lithium polymer battery that’s found in consumer smartphones. To make the robot swim, the motor pumps water into two balloon-like chambers in the fish’s tail that operate like a set of pistons in an engine. As one chamber expands, it bends and flexes to one side; when the actuators push water to the other channel, that one bends and flexes in the other direction.

These alternating actions create a side-to-side motion that mimics the movement of a real fish. By changing its flow patterns, the hydraulic system enables different tail maneuvers that result in a range of swimming speeds, with an average speed of about half a body length per second.

“The authors show a number of technical achievements in fabrication, powering, and water resistance that allow the robot to move underwater without a tether,” says Cecilia Laschi, a professor of biorobotics at the Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies in Pisa, Italy. “A robot like this can help explore the reef more closely than current robots, both because it can get closer more safely for the reef and because it can be better accepted by the marine species.”

The entire back half of the fish is made of silicone rubber and flexible plastic, and several components are 3-D-printed, including the head, which holds all of the electronics. To reduce the chance of water leaking into the machinery, the team filled the head with a small amount of baby oil, since it’s a fluid that will not compress from pressure changes during dives.

Indeed, one of the team’s biggest challenges was to get SoFi to swim at different depths. The robot has two fins on its side that adjust the pitch of the fish for up and down diving. To adjust its position vertically, the robot has an adjustable weight compartment and a “buoyancy control unit” that can change its density by compressing and decompressing air.

Katzschmann says that the team developed SoFi with the goal of being as nondisruptive as possible in its environment, from the minimal noise of the motor to the ultrasonic emissions of the team’s communications system, which sends commands using wavelengths of 30 to 36 kilohertz.

“The robot is capable of close observations and interactions with marine life and appears to not be disturbing to real fish,” says Rus.

The project is part of a larger body of work at CSAIL focused on soft robots, which have the potential to be safer, sturdier, and more nimble than their hard-bodied counterparts. Soft robots are in many ways easier to control than rigid robots, since researchers don’t have to worry quite as much about having to avoid collisions.

“Collision avoidance often leads to inefficient motion, since the robot has to settle for a collision-free trajectory,” says Rus, the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT. “In contrast, a soft robot is not just more likely to survive a collision, but could use it as information to inform a more efficient motion plan next time around.”

As next steps the team will be working on several improvements on SoFi. Katzschmann plans to increase the fish’s speed by improving the pump system and tweaking the design of its body and tail.

He says that they also plan to soon use the on-board camera to enable SoFi to automatically follow real fish, and to build additional SoFis for biologists to study how fish respond to different changes in their environment.

“We view SoFi as a first step toward developing almost an underwater observatory of sorts,” says Rus. “It has the potential to be a new type of tool for ocean exploration and to open up new avenues for uncovering the mysteries of marine life.”

This project was supported by the National Science Foundation.

For more about this story, including a video, please visit the MIT News website.

 

Date Posted: 

Friday, March 23, 2018 - 11:30am

Research Theme: 

Labs: 

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Made of silicone rubber, CSAIL’s “SoFi” could enable a closer study of aquatic life.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Rob Miller named Distinguished Professor in Computer Science

$
0
0

Professor Rob Miller

EECS Staff

 

Rob Miller has been appointed as the inaugural Distinguished Professor in Computer Science, EECS department head Asu Ozdaglar has announced.

"This newly endowed chair was established to recognize faculty with a strong interest in K-12 education and its relation to teaching and research in computer science education," Ozdaglar says. "The appointment recognizes Professor Miller’s leadership in the area of computer science education and research as well as his outstanding mentorship and educational contributions."

Miller is internationally well-known in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI), in which he has pioneered techniques for intelligent text editing using many cursors at once, developed new approaches for end-user scripting of web pages and desktop graphical interfaces, and made seminal contributions in crowdsourcing, particularly in orchestrating small contributions from many people to solve a complex problem.

His work on crowdsourcing and HCI has found new applications in computer science education, where organizing small contributions from a crowd of students can turn the size of a massive online or residential course into a virtue rather than a curse. Much of his group’s current work focuses on tools and techniques for teaching large programming courses, including clustering and visualizing many solutions to the same problem in order to identify common mistakes, find unusual but good solutions, and speed up grading.

Miller also makes substantial contributions to the Institute’s educational mission, Ozdaglar says. He has created or co-created three courses in software design: Software Construction (originally 6.005 (now 6.031); User Interface Design and Implementation (6.813); and Principles and Practice of Assistive Technology (6.811). He has also deployed 6.005 onto MITx, where it formed two modules of the Foundations of Computer Science XSeries. For his teaching contributions, he has received the Louis D. Smullin (’39) Award for Teaching Excellence, the Burgess (’52) & Elizabeth Jamieson Award for Excellence in Teaching, the MacVicar Faculty Fellowship, and the Teaching with Digital Technology Award.

As EECS education co-officer, Miller created a predictive model of student registration that helps distribute more than 200 teaching assistants (TAs) fairly across the department’s courses as well as a calendar tool that allows for better coordination of quizzes and deadlines between large courses.

 

 

Date Posted: 

Friday, March 23, 2018 - 12:00pm

Labs: 

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Long-time EECS faculty member is first to hold newly endowed professorship.

Photo: 

Four EECS faculty members receive promotions

$
0
0

L to R: Daskalakis, Han, Uhler, Zeldovich

EECS Staff

Four EECS faculty members have received significant promotions, department head Asu Ozdaglar has announced.

Constantinos Daskalakis and Nickolai Zeldovich were each promoted to full professor of EECS, while Ruonan Han and Caroline Uhler were each promoted to associate professor without tenure (AWOT). All the appointments are effective July 1, 2018.

Constantinos Daskalakis is a leading theoretical computer scientist working in a variety of areas involving foundations and applications of probability, including algorithmic game theory, mechanism design, and statistical sampling. He received a PhD from the University of California Berkeley in 2008 and joined MIT in 2009 after a one-year postdoctoral position at Microsoft Research. He is a member of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), and he was granted tenure in 2015.

Daskalakis began his research career working in the field of algorithmic game theory. His most notable result in that area says that Nash equilibria, which describe stable configurations of competitive multi-player games, cannot be computed efficiently. After obtaining a series of related results, he began working in mechanism design, where he obtained another breakthrough: he showed that the general problem of mechanism design, which allows a system to achieve desired results in the face of strategic, possibly dishonest participants, can be reduced to the simpler problem of algorithm design, in which the participants are assumed to be honest.

More recently, Daskalakis worked on a long-standing problem from economic theory: optimal pricing for multiple items. Again, he obtained a breakthrough result, this one providing a mathematical characterization of the structure of optimal solutions. He has also been pioneering new methods for discerning properties of unknown probability distributions by using sampling.

Among other honors, he has received a Game Theory and Computer Science Prize, an Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Doctoral Dissertation Award, a Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Outstanding Paper Prize, and a Vatican Giuseppe Sciacca Foundation Research and Development Award. At MIT, he has taught many courses in algorithms, probability, game theory, inference, and data science, and has received the EECS Ruth and Joel Spira Award for distinguished teaching.

Nickolai Zeldovich received a PhD from Stanford University in 2008 and, after a short postdoctoral appointment at Stanford, joined MIT later that year. He was granted tenure in 2014.

Zeldovich, also a CSAIL member, works on improving the state of computer-system security and on enabling new applications that might not be deployed today because of security concerns. To that end, he has worked on a variety of types of systems, including operating systems and distributed systems that avoid security vulnerabilities, systems that guarantee security even in the face of programmer errors, systems that recover gracefully from intrusions, systems that run applications on encrypted data, and systems that hide the identities of communicating parties.

Recently, he has also been developing rigorous techniques for finding security vulnerabilities in code or proving their absence, as well as building new secure applications such as cryptocurrencies.

Among other honors, he has received a Sloan Research Fellowship, an NSF CAREER Award, and an MIT Harold E. Edgerton Faculty Achievement Award. In February 2018, he was one of two EECS professors to receive the department’s Faculty Research Innovation Fellowship (FRIF), an award that recognizes midcareer faculty members for outstanding research contributions and international leadership and provides them with resources to pursue new research and development. At MIT, he has taught many different courses in systems and security, and has also received the EECS Ruth and Joel Spira Award for distinguished teaching.

Ruonan Han received a PhD degree in electrical engineering from Cornell University in January 2014. After a short stint as a research scientist at Cornell, he joined MIT as an assistant professor in July 2014, and he is also a core faculty member of the Microsystems Technology Laboratory (MTL). His work focuses on pushing the fundamental limits of chip-scale electronics and exploring new application opportunities in the realms of sensing and communications. In particular, he is pursuing critical problems in the important “terahertz gap” (0.1-10 THz).

Han’s work has generated multiple records in the performance metrics of silicon-based THz circuits, including the highest radiated power and the highest detection sensitivity. In addition, his group invented a new sensor architecture that maintains high efficiency across a scalable, broad bandwidth. His group also demonstrated new applications of THz chips beyond traditional wireless radio and non-invasive imaging: molecular spectroscopy with high specificity, ultra-broadband inter-chip link through a THz dielectric waveguide, and most recently, fully-electronic time-keeping with a molecular clock.

Han’s awards include an NSF CAREER Award and best student paper awards at the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC) and IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (RFIC) Symposium. He also received Cornell’s award for the best PhD thesis. At MIT, he has taught multiple courses in circuits, and contributed to the development of other courses in that subject. He served as the workshop chair of the 2016 IEEE International Wireless Symposium and is steering-committee member for the 2019 IEEE International Microwave Symposium, the flagship conference for the microwave theory and technique society.

Caroline Uhler received a PhD in Statistics from the University of California Berkeley in 2011. After serving as an assistant professor at IST Austria, she joined MIT as an assistant professor of EECS and a core faculty member of the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS). Currently, she is the Henry L. and Grace Doherty Assistant Professor of EECS and IDSS. 

Uhler’s primary expertise is in the general area of algebraic statistics, a field that focuses on the application of algebra, algebraic geometry, graph theory, optimization and combinatorics to statistical modeling. This broad expertise enables her to produce new paradigms and algorithms for the analysis of large heterogeneous data sets that arise in various applications. Her work to date has broken new ground on providing a systematic approach to studying graphical models. In her PhD work, she initiated the study of Gaussian graphical models using algebraic methods and introduced hyperbolic exponential families as a general class of graphical models that share the nice computational properties of Gaussian models. 

Uhler’s awards include a Sofja Kovalevskaja Award, a Sloan Research Fellowship, and an NSF CAREER Award. She was a plenary speaker on the subject of algebraic statistics during the 2017 SIAM Conference on Applied Algebraic Geometry.

She has developed two courses at MIT, one of which serves as the capstone class for the minor in statistics. She serves on the EECS admissions committee and the Broad Institute Fellows selection committee, and she was an organizer of the joint conference between MIT, Harvard, and Microsoft for Women in Data Science.

Date Posted: 

Friday, March 23, 2018 - 1:00pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Constantinos Daskalakis and Nickolai Zeldovich will become full professors, while Ruonan Han and Caroline Uhler will become associate professors, effective July 1, 2018.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 


Pablo Parrilo becomes a Fellow of the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics

$
0
0

   Professor Pablo Parrilo

 

EECS Staff

EECS Professor Pablo Parrilo has been named to the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Fellows Class of 2018.

Parrilo is among 28 new SIAM Fellows nominated for exemplary research and outstanding service to the professional community. He is specifically being “foundational contributions to algebraic methods in optimization and engineering,” according to SIAM.

Parrilo’s research interests include optimization methods for engineering applications, control and identification of uncertain complex systems, robustness analysis and synthesis, and the development and application of computational tools based on convex optimization and algorithmic algebra to practically relevant engineering problems.

At MIT, Parrilo is also affiliated with the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS) and the Operations Research Center (ORC). Previously, he was an assistant professor at the Automatic Control Laboratory of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich) and visiting associate professor at the California Institute of Technology.

In addition, he made short-term research visits to UC Santa Barbara (Physics), the Lund Institute of Technology (Automatic Control), and UC Berkeley (Mathematics). He received an undergraduate degree in electronics engineering from the University of Buenos Aires and a PhD in Control and Dynamical Systems from the California Institute of Technology.

His other awards and honors include a Finmeccanica Career Development Chair, the Donald P. Eckman Award of the American Automatic Control Council, the SIAM Activity Group on Control and Systems Theory (SIAG/CST) Prize, the IEEE Antonio Ruberti Young Researcher Prize, and the Farkas Prize of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) Optimization Society. He is also an IEEE fellow.

Parrilo and the other new fellows will be recognized for their achievements during SIAM’s annual meeting, to be held in July in Portland, Oregon.

 

Date Posted: 

Wednesday, April 4, 2018 - 5:30pm

Labs: 

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

The EECS faculty member is among 28 members of the SIAM Class of 2018.

Photo: 

Professor Dina Katabi wins ACM Prize in Computing

$
0
0

   Professor Dina Katabi. Photo: Simon Simard

 

Rachel Gordon | CSAIL

 

Dina Katabi, an EECS professor who created a wireless device that “sees through walls,” has won the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Prize in Computing for her significant contributions to wireless systems. The prestigious award comes with a $250,000 cash prize.

Katabi, the Andrew (1956) and Erna Viterbi Professor of EECS, is cited by ACM as being “one of the most innovative researchers in the field of networking." She has spearheaded research in wireless systems for health-monitoring technologies. A principal investigator at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Katabi has focused on systems that can better predict health outcomes in a non-invasive manner. She developed a device that analyzes the wireless signals in the environment to detect humans behind walls and measure metrics like movement, breathing rate, and walking speed, which are especially important for monitoring the health of the elderly.

In addition to her research in human-sensing technologies, Katabi has pioneered research in wireless networks to improve the data rate and reliability of Wi-Fi and cellular systems. Her designs and algorithms draw on advanced mathematical models to improve how data can be moved from one point to another in a given time. Her work has provided mechanisms for combating interference and avoiding dead spots.

Katabi is also known for the development of the Sparse Fourier Transform. Alongside MIT colleague Piotr Indyk and students, Katabi created an algorithm that computes the Fourier Transform much faster than the Fast Fourier Transform. The Sparse Fourier Transform has been used to solve problems in many fields, including computer networks, medical imaging, graphics, mobile systems, circuits, and biochemistry.

“Innovations that help facilitate communications across mobile networks address an important need,” says ACM President Vicki L. Hanson in a related press release. “Katabi’s work has contributed to a seamless increase in [mobile data] traffic, as well as the ever-increasing volumes of data that are shared over mobile systems. She is known for reimagining long-standing challenges in original ways.”

Katabi is also director of the Center for Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing at MIT. The ACM Prize is now among many honors she has received, including a MacArthur Fellowship and the ACM Grace Murray Hopper Award. In addition, she is an ACM Fellow and was elected to the National Academy of Engineering.

“Dina has done visionary work in taking a communications technology like wireless and being able to turn it into a meaningful metric for measuring all sorts of important health information, from heart rate and breathing to walking speed and sleep cycles,” says CSAIL Director Daniela Rus. “Her work has the potential to fundamentally transform the field of health care, and all of us at CSAIL are so very proud of her for being recognized with this honor.”

The award will be presented at the ACM’s annual awards banquet on June 23 in San Francisco.

Date Posted: 

Wednesday, April 4, 2018 - 5:45pm

Labs: 

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

EECS faculty member receives prestigious honor and $250,000 cash prize for her contributions to wireless systems.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Masterworks 2018: Last call for posters!

$
0
0

This is the last call for student participation in Masterworks 2018, EECS's annual celebration leading to the Master of Science (SM) and Master of Engineering (MEng) degrees.

The final, extended deadline for participants is Wednesday, April 18. You may sign up and register at the Masterworks registration site, where you'll also find details for poster specifications.

For questions or to request a poster template, email eecs-masterworks@mit.edu before the deadline.

Masterworks 2018 will be held on Thursday, April 26, 2018, from 5 to 6:30 p.m. on the Charles M. Vest Student Street in the Stata Center (Building 32, first floor). It immediately follows the Spring 2018 SuperUROP Showcase, held in the same location beginning at 3 p.m. Following the session, several prizes will be awarded. Hors d'oeuvres will be served throughout the sessions. Please join us!

 

Date Posted: 

Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 10:45am

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

The final deadline to register for participation is Wednesday, April 18.

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

MIT Intelligence Quest kicks off

$
0
0

School of Engineering Dean Anantha Chandrakasan addresses the crowd at the launch event. Photo: Gretchen Ertl

 

“In the history of science and technology, there are moments of opportunity,” MIT President L. Rafael Reif told a packed Kresge Auditorium on March 1. “Moments when the tools, the data, and the big questions are perfectly in sync. In the field of intelligence, I believe this is just such a moment.”

MIT faculty and friends helped the Institute celebrate the launch of a new initiative on human and machine intelligence, with a star-studded lineup of speakers from the interlocking realms of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, social sciences, and ethics. Several EECS professors and alumni were among the speakers.

“We are auguring in the Age of Intelligence right here,” said Eric Schmidt, the former executive chairman of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, as he joined Reif on stage. Schmidt and his wife provided financial support for the project’s first year. Google also donated funds to advance MIT student research in human and artificial intelligence.

“I think MIT is uniquely positioned to do this. I think you can turn Cambridge into a genuine AI center,” said Schmidt, an MIT Innovation Fellow and founding advisor to the MIT Intelligence Quest.

With MIT’s 200 or more intelligence researchers and culture of “compulsive curiosity,” the MIT Intelligence Quest will thrive on campus, said Anantha Chandrakasan, dean of the School of Engineering and the Vannevar Bush Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

“It will thrive because, when MIT people have their teeth in an interesting problem, they instinctively reach out across disciplines to solve it,” he said. “It will thrive because we can offer it a continuous flow of fresh minds and fresh thinking.”

 The time is ripe to “crack the code of intelligence” with a combination of neuroscience, cognitive science, and computer science, said MIT alumnus David Siegel SM ’86, PhD ’91, also a founding advisor to the MIT Intelligence Quest. He envisions the Intelligence Quest carrying on the spirit of MIT’s AI Lab at Tech Square in the 1980s, which spawned the building blocks of the Internet, RSA encryption, and the foundations AI and robotics.

“From the start of our history, we have been trying to grasp how the mind gives rise to intelligence,” said Siegel, co-chairman of Two Sigma Investments. “To truly understand it, I believe we need to get back to the basic science and also frame the question in engineering terms. The time to start is now. Our objectives are ambitious. But given MIT’s long history of tackling big problems, we must try. After all, if not us, then who?”

It is time to drive some breakthroughs in AI together, said MIT alumnus Xiao’ou Tang PhD ’96, the founder of SenseTime, a leading AI company in China, which has partnered with the MIT Intelligence Quest.

“Together we will definitely go beyond deep learning, go to the uncharted territory of deep thinking,” said Tang, a professor of information engineering at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Getting to the Core

The morning sessions of the MIT Intelligence Quest launch event were designed to mirror the two principal entities that will make up the Intelligence Quest itself: the Core and the Bridge. The Core will advance the science and engineering of both human and machine intelligence. The Bridge will be dedicated to the application of MIT discoveries in natural and artificial intelligence to all disciplines.  

A passion for the MIT Intelligence Quest itself — the puzzles, the breakthroughs, the careful work — marked the research presentations for the Core. Pacing the stage in an animated TED-style talk, James DiCarlo, head of the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, embodied this passion.

“My colleagues and I see a tremendous new opportunity for synergy. The science quest to understand human intelligence is one of the most exciting frontiers of our field: the quest to understand ourselves. And it’s aligned with the engineering quest of developing intelligent systems,” said DiCarlo, the Peter de Florez Professor of Neuroscience.

Then he shared an observation that was made in colorful ways throughout the day: The possibilities for discovery are great, but right now, “we are still very far from real AI.” The human brain is far superior to any existing form of artificial intelligence, which is why, he said, “as scientists, we have the opportunity — and obligation — to reverse engineer this brain machine.”

Daniela Rus, director of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) and the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, showed the same passion expressed from a different perspective: “Right now, the vast majority of AI algorithms are driven by mathematics and physics. When we learn more about the human brain, we will be able to develop nature-inspired algorithms.”

“Why science and engineering?” asked Tomaso Poggio, director of the Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines and the Eugene McDermott Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. He traced major developments in machine learning to neuroscience. The Core will feature projects that require both science and engineering, which is a good thing because “ideally we want to make ourselves and our brains more intelligent than the machines we are building.”

A craving for data

Teaching machines to see and hear was the focus for Antonio Torralba, MIT director of the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab and a professor of electrical engineering and computer science. At one point, he showed a video of a child happily listening to a storybook but bursting into shrieks when the reading stopped. “Just like machines, kids also need a lot of data,” Torralba said, with a smile. “And they don’t like it when you stop giving them data.”

Indeed, look to the playground for the intelligence platform you see, said Laura Schultz, a professor of cognitive science. Children learn concepts naturally. They have sophisticated social cognition and an intelligence that can “see past what things actually are to see what they might mean, or become.”

“This kind of intelligence might seem almost unimaginably far away,” she said. “But if we are going to succeed at engineering it, we first have to understand it, and the good news is that we actually have a platform like this already here at MIT, at the daycare.”

Rebecca Saxe, a professor of cognitive neuroscience, showed a baby watching a movie in an MRI machine. “We took the first ever MRI images of a baby’s brain while he looked at faces,” she said. “And we discovered something remarkable.” Their results revealed an organized pattern of brain activity develops very early, with regions of the infant brain more active when babies look at faces. 

The value of the child intelligence system is not lost on Josh Tenenbaum, a professor of computational cognitive science. “Children are the only system in the known universe that demonstrably, reliably, reproducibly, builds human-level intelligence. So why not build AI this way? Why haven’t we yet?” he asked. “I think the reason is that only now do we have a scientific field studying how children learn and think that is mature enough to offer guidance for AI.”

Building a humanistic bridge

In the Bridge session, speakers detailed projects that highlighted the remarkable potential benefits of AI: social robots that help children learn and engage the depressed, algorithms that can predict and prevent cancer, Wi-Fi signals that detect when elderly people fall, even algorithms that build personalized investment portfolios.

James Collins, the Termeer Professor of Medical Engineering and Science, talked about programmable cells and the world of possible applications in various realms: medicine, energy, environment, and agriculture.

“I also have a vision for AI,” said Cynthia Breazeal, associate professor of media arts and sciences, next. “I envision an AI that helps us to be smarter and more productive and to flourish — and heightens the ability for people to deeply connect.”

“AI needs to be able to engage our social and emotional selves in addition to our cognitive selves,” she added, as people watched film of elderly people with Jibo, a social robot that she designed. It danced, cooed, and looked with friendly curiosity at them.

Regina Barzilay, the Delta Electronics Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, pointed to a map of the world covered in red markings that indicate deaths from cancer. “I firmly believe with all of our strengths in machine learning and connections we really have a chance to wipe the red from this map.” Her own work in machine learning is making strides toward that goal.

“I want you to imagine with me a home of the future where the home will monitor your health,” said Dina Katabi, the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, drawing listeners into a presentation on how AI enables the home to monitor the physical and mental health of its inhabitants using Wi-Fi signals.

In a presentation playfully titled, “Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Stupidity, and Financial Markets,” Andrew Lo, director of the MIT Laboratory for Financial Engineering and the Charles and Susan T. Harris Professor, described algorithms that factor in unproductive human actions that impact financial markets: loss aversion, overconfidence, and overreaction. “We don’t need artificial intelligence so much as artificial humanity,” he said.

Marin Soljacic, a professor of physics, capped the Bridge session off by talking about how AI processing will improve with optical neural networks. “We’re talking about nearly instantaneous execution, much higher frequencies than electronics, ultra low power consumption!” The crowd shared his enthusiasm.

The consequences: intelligence and society

“In my estimation AI is going to touch all these industries: energy, advance manufacturing, space, advanced materials, life science and biotech, internet of things,” said Katie Rae, CEO and managing partner of The Engine, which bridges the gap between discovery and commercialization by empowering disruptive technologies with the long-term capital, knowledge, and specialized equipment and labs they need to thrive.

“What does it mean for us to build machines that can think?” asked Melissa Nobles, the Kenan Sahin Dean of the MIT School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, during the panel discussion, “The Consequences: Intelligence and Society.”

“What are the social, economic, political, artistic, ethical, and spiritual consequences of trying to make what happens in our minds happen in a machine? Who does this machine answer to?” asked Nobles, a professor of political science.

Gideon Lichfield, editor-in-chief of MIT Technology Review, moderated the discussion, which delved into AI’s potential dark side, exploring issues such as the impact on jobs and the economy, algorithmic bias, and the unchecked power of private industry.

“We need thoughtful folks to really put their values into the system and pay mindful attention,” said MIT alumna Megan Smith’86, SM ’88, a former U.S. chief technology officer and a former vice president at Google. Pointing to her shirt, which read “Computer Science for All,” Smith said all school children should learn coding and design thinking. “It’s about confidence. Part of the future of work is including everyone in developing solutions,” said Smith, founder and CEO of shift7.

Dario Gil, vice president of AI and quantum computing at IBM, said AI technologies draw on such large and pre-existing data sets, it’s more difficult for people to recognize the misuse of variables such as race, age, and gender. “It becomes more opaque,” he said.

“I’d like to talk about job displacement,” said Rodney Brooks, a former CSAIL director. “We don’t have any capability of robots interacting with people. Who is going to do the physical tasks?” asked Brooks, the MIT Panasonic Professor of Robotics Emeritus.

And guidance from a reliable government would be welcome, said several panelists, including Joi Ito, director of the MIT Media Lab. “I think we can look to countries that have functional democracies to see how they are starting to grapple with some of these social questions,” he said.

“We haven’t had enough human intelligence to go with machine intelligence,” added Daron Acemoglu, the Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics. “The real promise of machine-human intelligence is to create jobs that are higher paying and more pleasant and that leave greater room for people to develop their creativity. The application of digital technology can do this — but we need to step back and develop it the right way.”

“It is about the types of artificial intelligence we create,” Acemoglu added. “And it’s about getting a broader set of people working on developing it.”

The event wrapped up at the Media Lab with a student poster session that included projects focused on communication: humans, robots, AI; algorithms of AI; physics, engineering, and security; and vision and language.

For more on MIT IQ, visit the MIT News website or intelligencequest.mit.edu

Date Posted: 

Wednesday, March 7, 2018 - 5:15pm

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

A star-studded lineup that featured several EECS faculty members and alumni helped celebrate the launch of a new initiative focused on human and machine intelligence.

Photo: 

Institute for Data, Systems, and Society to launch new MicroMasters and PhD programs

$
0
0

 

Photo: John Parrillo, courtesy MIT System Design & Management

I

 

The MIT Statistics and Data Science Center (SDSC), a part of the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS), announced two new academic programs today: the MicroMasters program in Statistics and Data Science, and the Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in Statistics, both beginning in the fall.

The MicroMasters program, currently under development by MIT faculty, will be offered online through edX. “Digital technologies are enabling us to bring MIT’s data science curriculum to learners around the world regardless of their location or socioeconomic status,” says Vice President for Open Learning Sanjay Sarma.

The curriculum includes foundational knowledge of data science methods and tools, a deep dive into probability and statistics, and opportunities to learn, implement, and experiment with data analysis techniques and machine learning algorithms.

“The demand for data scientists is growing rapidly,” says Dean for Digital Learning Krishna Rajagopal. “This new program increases the supply of professionals who are masters of the data science of today, and who have the foundational understanding needed to keep on top of the data science of tomorrow.”

“The MicroMasters program precisely addresses the unmet educational demand of working professionals who are trying to train themselves in statistics and data science in a rigorous manner without leaving their day job and without compromising on quality,” adds EECS Professor Devavrat Shah, who is both director of SDSC and a core faculty member of IDSS.

Learners obtain the MITx MicroMasters credential by completing online courses and a proctored test. “The MicroMasters will bring MIT’s rigorous, high-quality curricula and hands-on learning approach to learners around the world — at scale,” says Rajagopal. “For those who wish to advance their careers, the MITx MicroMasters will be a valuable professional credential. They will also be eligible to accelerate their completion of a PhD degree at MIT — or a master’s degree elsewhere.”

The program will launch in the fall, with enrollments opening June 5. Prospective students and interested institutions can sign up for updates from MITx. “This program embodies the IDSS vision of education in statistics and data science,” says IDSS Director Munther Dahleh, who is also the William A. Coolidge Professor in EECS. “We expect many universities to adopt this program as the basis for a masters program in data science.”

This fall SDSC and IDSS will also launch the Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in Statistics (IDPS). IDPS is designed for students currently enrolled in a participating MIT doctoral program who wish to develop their understanding of 21st century statistics, using concepts of computation and data analysis as well as elements of classical statistics and probability within their chosen field of study.

IDPS students will take core classes in probability and statistics, as well as computation and data analysis courses that vary by home department. Participating departments include Aeronautics and Astronautics, Economics, Mathematics, and Political Science as well as IDSS’s own doctoral program in Social and Engineering Systems. Students’ dissertation research will use statistical methods in a substantial way.

The announcement of both new programs was made by Shah during opening remarks of SDSC’s annual Statistics and Data Science conference, which brought academic leaders, industry innovators, and rising stars in the fields of statistics and data science to MIT’s campus.

For related information, visit the MIT News website.

 

Date Posted: 

Friday, April 20, 2018 - 7:15am

Labs: 

Card Title Color: 

Black

Card Description: 

Interdisciplinary doctoral program in statistics and online MicroMasters program in statistics and data science begin this fall

Photo: 

Card Wide Image: 

Viewing all 1281 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>